The Manipur Information Commission, in its July 7, 2025 ruling (Appeal Case No. 74 of 2025), further validated these claims, stating that the appellant was “satisfied” with the information provided—effectively confirming the person’s unauthorized role.
TFM Report
An explosive vigilance complaint has been filed against one Nungshitombi Athokpam, accusing her of illegally functioning as the “Joint Secretary” of the Manipur Human Rights Commission (MHRC) without any official appointment. The complaint, submitted by Advocate Okram Nutankumar Singh to the Manipur State Vigilance Commission, alleges gross misconduct, violation of service rules, and potential criminal offenses under Indian law.
RTI Exposes Shocking Irregularities
The complaint hinges on damning evidence uncovered through the Right to Information (RTI) Act. Documents reveal that Athokpam issued staff appointment orders on February 1, 2018, signing as “Joint Secretary, MHRC.” However, an RTI response from the Department of Personnel, Government of Manipur, confirmed that no official appointment order was ever issued in her name.
The Manipur Information Commission, in its July 7, 2025 ruling (Appeal Case No. 74 of 2025), further validated these claims, stating that the appellant was “satisfied” with the information provided—effectively confirming Athokpam’s unauthorized role.
Legal Violations & Criminal Charges Invoked
Advocate Nutankumar’s complaint outlines severe legal breaches, including:
– Impersonation of a public servant (Section 170 BNS / 204 IPC)
– Cheating & forgery (Sections 417, 318 BNS, 465, 468 IPC)
– Disobeying lawful authority (Section 166 IPC / 198 BNS)
– Fabricating official documents (Section 335 BNS)
The complaint also cites violations of constitutional norms under Article 166, which mandates that executive actions must be lawfully authorized.
Demand for FIR & Vigilance Probe
Advocate Nutankumar has demanded an immediate FIR and a time-bound vigilance probe, warning that inaction could erode public trust and set a dangerous precedent. “This is a case of serious and systematic misconduct,” the complaint states, urging accountability to uphold the integrity of administrative institutions.
Broader Implications
If proven, the allegations could trigger sweeping reforms in the MHRC’s appointment processes and operational oversight. The case has already sent shockwaves through Manipur’s bureaucratic circles, raising questions about transparency and governance. As the Vigilance Commission weighs its next steps, all eyes are on whether justice will prevail in this high-stakes legal battle.